August 2010 Issue
Fueled by Technology — Athletes Achieve Top Performance With Diabetes Management Tools
By Juliann Schaeffer
Vol. 12 No. 8 P. 22
All athletes face challenges. For a marathoner, it could be the physical pain of shin splints or mustering the motivation to slip on those running shoes each morning. But athletes with diabetes face challenges that are unique to their disease—and that they must continually manage to prevent what can swiftly turn to critical and life-threatening consequences of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.
Glucose levels can fluctuate based on several exercise or competition aspects, including exercise type, intensity, and duration; time of day; emotional state; environmental conditions; and absorption rates of insulin and food. Add to that the frustrating reality that no two people with diabetes will react the same to any combination of these factors, and you begin to realize the unremitting actuality that athletes with diabetes face in the pursuit of their performance best.
Joe Eldridge, cofounder of Team Type 1, the first professional cycling racing team with riders who have type 1 diabetes, details the difficulties he faced when diagnosed with diabetes in 1992: “When I was first diagnosed … it was very challenging to manage diabetes and be a top-level athlete. At that time, the blood glucose monitors took over two minutes to check your blood glucose levels. Also, the insulin that was available had peaks when it would start to work. You would have to plan out your training and competitions based on when your insulin would be peaking. If things changed, with delays or cancellations of events, this made managing your blood sugar even more difficult.”
Circumstances change often in the world of sports, where winning is the end goal, not glucose control. But fortunately for athletes with diabetes, technological advancements of the past few decades are allowing them to level the playing field to a point where they can focus more on succeeding in their sport while simultaneously triumphing over their disease.
Diabetes-Specific Sport Challenges
The biggest worry for patients with diabetes when exercising is developing hypoglycemia, says Sheri Colberg, PhD, FACSM, an exercise science professor at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Va., and author of the Diabetic Athlete’s Handbook: Your Guide to Peak Performance, noting that both athletes with type 1 and type 2 diabetes face hurdles, albeit different ones. “Generally, the greatest challenges are faced by athletes with type 1 diabetes, who have to balance food and insulin intake to maintain their blood glucose levels. They have a high risk of developing low blood sugars, both during and following exercise, if they do not compensate with changes in their insulin and/or food intake. For athletes with type 2 diabetes, they have to worry a lot less about lows, but with regular physical activity, they may need to consult their healthcare provider about lowering doses of oral medications and/or insulin (if they use it) due to the insulin-sensitizing effects of exercise.”
Matt Corcoran, MD, CDE, an endocrinologist and president and CEO of Diabetes Training Camp, explains that for someone without diabetes, the body regulates its own fuel metabolism, allowing for both efficient and effective exercise naturally. Yet “exercisers and athletes [with diabetes] have to manage their own fuel supply, and the main way that they do it is either by regulating their insulin supply and/or nutrition supply,” he says.
“And things can change rapidly, on a minute-to-minute basis,” he adds. “It’s a much more complicated, erratic system for someone with type 1 diabetes than it will be for most people with type 2 diabetes” who aren’t insulin dependent.
Corcoran notes that he’s seen more psychological and behavioral issues in people with type 2 diabetes, so simply getting some of these patients to participate in physical activity is sometimes the biggest challenge. But, physically, people with type 2 diabetes who aren’t insulin dependent won’t “have the kind of flux in terms of their glucose control that somebody with type 1 diabetes will have,” he says.
Constance Brown-Riggs, MSEd, RD, CDE, CDN, a spokesperson for the American Dietetic Association, owner of CBR Nutrition Enterprises, and author of The African American Guide to Living Well With Diabetes, adds that it’s not just the type of diabetes that presents different challenges; the athlete’s treatment and medication also matter. “Athletes with type 2 diabetes may be treated with diet and exercise alone or oral medications such as metformin or [injectable] exenatide, which pose little threat of hypoglycemia, [while] those with type 2 diabetes on sulfonylureas or insulin are at increased risk of hypoglycemia.”
Technologies Alleviate Athletic Obstacles
The past few decades have witnessed the introduction of new insulins, medications, and technologies for diabetes treatment. These positive developments have undoubtedly aided diabetes management overall, but athletes with diabetes are doubly benefiting because better-managed diabetes off the court allows for better performance on the court. “Two decades ago, diabetic athletes had access to a limited number of blood glucose meters, and they were bigger, slower to give a reading, and much more expensive. Also, the types of insulins available were limited, and most were harder to adjust doses of to compensate for physical activity,” says Colberg.
“Today’s athletes have a huge variety of meters to choose from and even the option of continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] with CGM devices,” she continues. “Newer, rapid-acting insulin analogues are also available now, giving athletes who pump or inject insulin the ability to reduce their insulin levels during exercise much more effectively to make their physiological responses more like nondiabetic athletes experience naturally.”
While 20 years ago people with diabetes had to change their lifestyle to match the time action of their insulin, today’s insulins—and technologies—are prescribed to match an individual’s lifestyle, explains Brown-Riggs.
Blood Glucose Meters
According to Colberg, the advancement with the most influence has been the wide availability and affordability of blood glucose meters. “The reason they have had such a large impact is that they are tools that allow athletes to know what their blood glucose levels are at any time point,” she says.
“Prior to the 1980s, when these first became more widely available, an athlete would have to exercise without having a clue of what his/her blood sugar was. Most athletes find that their blood sugar needs to be between 80 and 180 mg/dL for them to perform optimally. So if they were [at] 250 [mg/dL] and had no way of knowing or adjusting for it, their performance likely suffered. They also had to worry more about getting unanticipated low blood sugars,” she explains.
The effort and inconvenience of monitoring blood glucose prior to the advent of glucose meters, while easily overlooked today, should not be understated, according to Corcoran. Before meters, people with diabetes used to determine glucose levels by first collecting a urine sample, then dropping a tablet in the sample before discerning what color it turned—not exactly clear or convenient. “So there wasn’t a way to have constant monitoring of what the glucose levels were doing,” says Corcoran, adding that the insulins of that time put people at risk for very wide fluctuations in glucose levels.
Luigi Meneghini, MD, MBA, a professor of clinical medicine at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and director of the Eleanor and Joseph Kosow Diabetes Treatment Center at the Diabetes Research Institute, explains, “Now we have blood glucose meters that can give you results in five seconds, require less blood, and are less painful, which is important for athletes as they try to … understand their blood glucose response to exercise, insulin, and food intake. These are all variables that these athletes need to manage aggressively, often in extreme circumstances depending on their particular situations.”
“You don’t need to be a chemist to get a blood glucose reading,” Brown-Riggs says of today’s technology, adding that glucose meters also provide more reliable results.
CGM systems have been another important tool for athletes who wish to compete in sports without having to worry about what will happen to their glucose levels, according to Amy Hess Fischl, MS, RD, LDN, BC-ADM, CDE, program coordinator for the Teen and Adolescent Diabetes Transition Program at the University of Chicago’s Kovler Diabetes Center.
CGM devices have three components: a receiver, transmitter, and sensor. The sensor is inserted beneath a patient’s skin, while a wire reads the amount of glucose in the fluid under the skin. The transmitter is then attached to the sensor and transmits the information to a receiver, which resembles an oversized pager, on which the user reads the glucose level. These devices give glucose readings roughly every five minutes.
“During exercise they can be used to monitor glucose trends, although they are not as effective at picking up hypoglycemia, given their 10- to 20-minute time lag behind actual blood glucose levels,” says Colberg.
“This device does not give a blood glucose reading, since it is reading the amount of glucose that is in the fluid under the skin,” explains Hess Fischl.
“The sensor is changed every three to seven days, depending on the type of sensor,” she adds, noting the importance of calibration for CGM devices. “In order for the information to be accurate, calibrations need to be completed. These calibrations require that a blood glucose reading be inputted into the device to make sure that the glucose reading from the sensor is similar to the blood glucose result.”
Stuart Weiss, MD, an endocrinologist at New York University Medical Center, says the idea is to “know what the trend is going into exercise and then adjust either the rate of the insulin pump or the consumption of insulin or food to maintain the blood sugar at a reasonable rate.”
Weiss notes that CGM systems are meant to be an educational tool showing trends but can also be used as an alert mechanism, especially during exercise. CGM alarm capabilities can alert patients when their glucose levels are outside a preset range, which can be imperative for athletes with diabetes, whose levels can change quickly while exercising.
With intermediate-acting insulins of the past having the capacity to drop blood sugars, an exercising athlete’s blood sugar could fall without the individual being aware, leaving the athlete to deal with a rather profound low blood sugar and the correlating consequences—not the least of which, to an athlete, relates to the immediate abandon of the athletic endeavor. “So the sensing is really important in that it allows us to understand how to manipulate an insulin pump or basal insulin in order to prevent either very low or very high blood sugars,” explains Weiss.
“Now, by using continuous glucose monitoring systems, patients can watch the trend of their blood sugar and make adjustments in their consumption of sugar in order to prevent any kind of profound hypoglycemic events,” he adds.
Another advance that has eased difficulties for athletes with diabetes is insulin pumps, according to Colberg. “Since basal insulin rates on them can be adjusted down during exercise, they allow athletes to create a more ‘normal’ physiological response to activity, which is a lowering of insulin levels during exercise. They can also adjust basal insulin doses postexercise to more effectively prevent later-onset hypoglycemia,” she says.
Insulin pumps deliver either rapid- or short-acting insulin through a catheter placed under the skin, and they “allow for people to change their insulin-dosing strategy on a minute-to-minute or hour-to-hour basis, so it allows for much more precise insulin dosing—and precision is key when you’re talking about dosing insulin for participation in exercise or sports,” says Corcoran.
Corcoran notes the flexibility that pumps afford athletes when exercising, allowing them to alter their insulin dosage based on athletic activities. He explains, “Someone who utilizes a pump and plans to go for a run at 4 pm may want to affect their insulin levels between 4 pm and 8 pm to decrease their risk of low blood sugar. As a result, they may lower their basal insulin rates from 2 pm to 6 pm to decrease their insulin levels during and after their run. A person [who] utilizes injection therapy can do all the same activities, but they won’t be able to manipulate their basal insulin in a similar way.”
Pumps also allow athletes with a steady blood sugar prior to exercise who will be spending an extended amount of time being active to set up a temporary infusion rate that’s lower than the usual insulin infusion rate, reducing the likelihood of experiencing hypoglycemia, Corcoran explains.
Several different insulin pumps are currently on the market, although all do basically the same thing in different ways, says Weiss. “There are pumps that have programmable capacities that are different from others. There’s the pump without tubing [the OmniPod]. There’s a couple more podlike devices that are coming out without tubing and wiring. There are also devices that will incorporate both pumping and sensing, and there’s a lot of those in development. For the athlete, that’s really the best way to go,” says Weiss, who notes that athletes benefit greatly from using a CGM and an insulin pump together.
“The pump itself doesn’t ‘know’ anything,” he explains. “The sensor will tell you what the blood sugar is; the pump is just delivering the insulin. So the sensor and the pump used together works well. Although the sensor doesn’t tell the pump what to do, the sensor tells the operator what to do. And then the operator has to make the adjustment on the pump. Most people who are doing serious exercise with type 1 diabetes in this day and age are doing both pumping and sensing, and it really makes a big difference in terms of the ability to commit to the exercise. A lot of type 1 patients will not do exercise for fear of low blood sugars, and with the pump it makes the ability to avoid low blood sugars very easy to do.”
Adjustments and Improvements
Diabetes treatments and technologies are constantly evolving. And while the technologies available today are leaps and bounds ahead of those that existed 15 years ago, “there is always room for improvement,” says Hess Fischl.
“Like all newer technologies, they will be developed further to work better as time progresses,” says Colberg, noting difficulties in that CGM devices do not detect rapid changes in blood glucose levels very effectively due to a time lag between glucose levels in blood and in interstitial fluids, where the sensor is inserted. “It would also be better to have a noninvasive way to measure glucose levels continuously as well as a way to get ‘real-time’ readings.”
Regarding what’s on the horizon for diabetes treatment, she says researchers have been working for quite some time on various noninvasive devices to measure blood glucose levels, with one potentially offering athletes a way to get even more precise feedback on blood glucose levels at any given time.
Some experts look forward to the day that insulin pumps are developed to be used in a “closed-loop” system that will work much like an actual pancreas. However, Colberg believes it might be more beneficial for athletes with diabetes if researchers were to figure out a way to harness the immune system and regenerate beta cells naturally.
“My opinion is that it will be a long time before they can make a closed-loop system that would work well during exercise, mainly because the measurements that the current attempts at closed systems have to rely on are not ‘real time’ themselves, and exercise causes dramatic and rapid changes in blood glucose levels at times,” she explains. “The glucose measurements are interstitial and lagging behind actual [blood glucose] changes, and the insulin that a pump can deliver is delivered subcutaneously (not into the portal vein like real insulin) and have to be absorbed from skin depots. A closed-loop system will never work as well as simply being able to regenerate and retain your own working beta cells.”
But Colberg notes that the biggest challenge for athletes with diabetes (and her highest hope for a technological “cure”) relates to the lack of information currently known about the whys and hows of glucose fluctuations—”that maintaining blood glucose levels requires some knowledge of anticipated responses and some guesswork when making regimen changes. If the guesswork can be removed with a computer algorithm that anticipates changes more effectively at some point, fewer athletes would have to contend with hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia affecting their performance during exercise,” she says.
What RDs Should Know
As an advanced practice RD who works daily with patients who have diabetes, Hess Fischl advocates for RDs getting involved in the training of all technology devices. “Scope of practice and protocols set in place throughout the country vary, but the only thing that is beyond our scope is actually piercing a person’s skin. It is well within all RDs’ scope of practice to train individuals on these devices,” she says, noting that RDs are in a unique position when it comes to working with patients with diabetes.
“Given that we are the experts when it comes to meal planning, it is very easy for us to help the athlete integrate all components of their care and help them understand how it all fits together. RDs should be proactive and contact the technology companies to stay abreast with what is available and get trained on all the devices. The American Dietetic Association has many practice groups, but the Diabetes Care and Education practice group has a technology task force that helps people get the information they need about the technologies,” she says.
Brown-Riggs says dietitians should spread the message that with proper education and planning, people with diabetes can live an active life and compete successfully in any sport. “I always tell my patients [that] no one wants a diagnosis of diabetes. But if you have to have it, now is a good time because we know so much more today in terms of treatment and management,” she says.
With the tools, technologies, and medications that are available to individuals with diabetes today, Colberg sees no reason why any individual should be dissuaded from participating in regular physical activity. While noting that no current technology can eliminate the trial-and-error part of exercise participation, she says the message for anyone with diabetes is that “the key to living long and well—with or without diabetes—is to be physically active throughout your lifetime. For people with diabetes, it is even more essential because in addition to gaining all the usual health benefits of exercise, they also gain the ability to manage their diabetes more effectively.”
No one-size-fits-all solution exists for diabetes management or exercise involvement, and it can be a complex process for athletes with diabetes to learn what their body needs in order to thrive in an athletic environment. Yet the message Corcoran wants to drive home is crystal clear—both with healthcare providers and those with diabetes—”that people with diabetes should be able to do whatever they want to do, whether it’s sports or not.”
Recent technological advancements are helping people do just that. As Eldridge explains, “I used to have to live around my diabetes. Now with my current treatments, diabetes is just a part of my day.”
— Juliann Schaeffer is an editorial assistant at Today’s Dietitian.
• Diabetic Athlete’s Handbook: Your Guide to Peak Performance by Sheri Colberg
• Diabetes Exercise and Sports Association: www.diabetes-exercise.org
With Aid of Technology, Racecar Driver Leaves Worries in the Dust
One example of how athletes are overcoming diabetes-related challenges with the help of technology is Charlie Kimball, the only licensed driver in the Indy Racing League with diabetes. Although currently ranked second in the points standing and projected to vie for the 2010 Indy Lights championship, Kimball was sidelined three years ago after being diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at a routine physician’s visit.
With no family history or previous knowledge of the disease, Kimball thought his dream of being a professional racecar driver might go unrealized. But after a little strategizing with his doctor, along with a helping of soul searching, Kimball got back in the racecar and never looked back.
Kimball quickly realized that racecar driving presented special challenges. “Unlike other sports, [such as] baseball, basketball, or soccer, I can’t call time-out and check my blood sugar during a race. Once the green flag flies, I’ve got to be fully prepared, fully committed, ready to race, hammer and tongs … for 100 miles … at full tilt against guys that if I said, ‘Hey, can you hold on, I need a snack,’ they’d just laugh at me,” explains Kimball.
Thankfully, Kimball has the help of technology to aid his diabetes management while driving. First, he wears a continuous glucose monitor that is attached with Velcro to the steering wheel, so his blood sugar level is displayed on the dashboard along with the car’s water temperature, speed, and oil pressure data. “It’s a separate display, but it’s right there as part of the car body data display, so I know what my blood sugar is,” Kimball says.
While driving, he also sports a special helmet system that enables him to take a sip of orange juice if his blood sugar levels get too low—without lifting a finger. “There’s a bottle up in the front of the car that I fill with orange juice and the tube runs up and plugs into a tube in my helmet so that when I’m driving, if an alarm on my CGM goes off and shows my blood sugar is getting low, I can drink that orange juice and bring it up so that I don’t have to stop,” he explains.
And while traveling for races and other events, Kimball takes insulin using an on-the-go pen device to keep his glucose levels in check. “There are lots of different challenges thrown at me, and having the ability and the flexibility of the Levemir FlexPen to be able to inject myself on the go really helps me,” he says.
Kimball is a big proponent that diabetes shouldn’t close any doors to athletic potential. “I am a better athlete because of diabetes rather than despite it,” he says. “There were definitely times when I thought I wouldn’t be back into a racecar. And so now when I am, I appreciate it that much more and each success is that much sweeter.
“The biggest point to be made is that diabetes doesn’t have to slow you down,” he adds. “With good healthcare, good management, good routine, and good discipline, on both the healthcare provider and the patient side, just about anything is possible.”