May 2014 Issue

Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy — Considerations and Nutritional Implications
By Lillian Craggs-Dino, DHA, RDN, LDN
Today’s Dietitian
Vol. 16 No. 5 P. 44

Suggested CDR Learning Codes: 5125, 5370, 5390; Level 2
Take this course and earn 2 CEUs on our Continuing Education Learning Library

Click here for the patient handout “Dietary Stages Following Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.”

Click here for the patient handout “General Bariatric Nutrition Requirements.”

According to the World Health Organization, global obesity rates have steadily risen and nearly doubled since the 1980s, posing a major public health crisis and contributing to premature death.1 Obesity rates in the United States also have been sharply rising since the 1980s, and current statistics indicate that more than 35% of the US population is obese.2

While obesity prevention continues to be the focus of many federal and public health initiatives, those who already suffer from obesity or morbid obesity often have unsuccessfully tried conventional methods of losing weight, including diet and exercise therapy, behavioral modification, and pharmacology. Bariatric surgery is recognized as a clinically effective intervention for obesity and morbid obesity.3

Bariatric surgery is regarded appropriately as metabolic surgery and is gaining popularity as evidence shows it resolves many comorbid conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and dyslipidemia.4

While Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RNYGBP) is the most common bariatric procedure performed in the United States, vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) is becoming the surgery of choice for both practitioners and patients, mainly because of the ease of surgery compared with gastric bypass and the elimination of bowel rearrangement and potential long-term complications.

This continuing education course reviews the historical and current progression of VSG, its known mechanism of action, indications and contraindications for undergoing the procedure, and pre- and postoperative nutritional considerations. This course brings to the forefront the critical role nutrition plays in preventing or treating complications and suggests current, practical, and evidence-based dietary recommendations.

History and Description
VSG, also called laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, vertical gastrectomy, the gastric sleeve, or just the sleeve, is a bariatric procedure first introduced in 1988 as the restrictive part of a dramatic bariatric surgery to treat morbid and supermorbid obesity called biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). BPD-DS provides both restrictive and malabsorptive mechanisms of action, with the sleeve providing the restrictive portion.5

Because BPD-DS was associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in patients with a BMI of 60 or higher, Michel Gagner, MD, considered one of the world’s foremost experts in minimally invasive surgery, proposed sleeve gastrectomy as the first step of the procedure in these high-risk patients to be followed by a second procedure with the gastric bypass or BPD-DS.6 However, VSG as the first step in the two-step procedure showed excellent weight-loss results and led to the proposal of the sleeve as a stand-alone procedure. As a result, since 2003, VSG has been offered as a stand-alone bariatric procedure.7

In 2012, the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) updated its position statement on VSG as a bariatric procedure. The ASMBS recognizes VSG as both a primary procedure and as the first stage in a two-step surgery.8
In June 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services approved insurance coverage for VSG, subject to local jurisdiction, for patients with a BMI of 35 or higher, at least one weight-related comorbid condition, and for whom conventional and medical treatment for obesity have been unsuccessful.9

VSG is a left partial vertical gastrectomy and a modification of the Magenstrasse and Mill procedure, performed by a minimally invasive surgical technique called laparoscopy. The original Magenstrasse and Mill procedure was first performed in 1987 by David Johnston, MD, a former professor of surgery at the University of Auckland in New Zealand, and was considered a type of gastroplasty whereby a long narrow tube is created from the lesser curvature of the stomach. This is referred to as the Magenstrasse, or “street of the stomach,” and passes food from the esophagus to the antral “mill.”10

With VSG, between 70% and 85% of the stomach along the greater curvature is removed. The pylorus is retained, and this is significant for allowing normal grinding and food bolus formation for duodenal entry (see Figures 1 and 2 below). The normal path of digestion and absorption isn’t disrupted with VSG compared with bariatric surgeries such as RNYGBP and BPD-DS.

Figure 1: VSG in Relation to Other Digestive Organs
clip

Figure 2: VSG

clip

— Images courtesy of Ethicon, Inc

The sleeve resembles a long, thin, bananalike tube. A French bougie, the size of which varies depending on surgeon preference, is used to calibrate the sleeve size. Bougie sizes range from 32 to 60 French (F) and are believed to affect long-term weight loss capability. Depending on the bougie size, the resulting volume of food the sleeve can hold and process ranges from 90 to 220 mL.

An increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux has been positively associated with smaller bougie sizes, while weight-loss efficacy is suspected to be compromised by using larger bougie sizes because less restriction is achieved.11 In the original Magenstrasse and Mill procedure, Johnston and colleagues found that using a bougie size of 40 F resulted in significant weight regain.10 However, Parikh and colleagues showed that using a bougie size of 40 F compared with 60 F didn’t produce a significant difference in weight loss at six or 12 months postsurgery.12 According to the International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement, the optimal bougie size is 32 to 36 F.13

How Weight Loss Is Achieved
Bariatric surgery promotes weight loss through three mechanisms of action: food intake restriction (restrictive), calorie and nutrient malabsorption (malabsorptive), or a combination of both (combination). RNYGBP is a combination procedure, while BPD-DS, because of the dramatic resection of the intestines, is classified as a malabsorptive procedure.

According to the surgical literature, VSG is considered a restrictive procedure because reduced stomach size causes early satiety and reduced oral intake.5 However, increasing evidence suggests that VSG induces weight loss through other physiological alterations, not just restriction, including increased intraluminal stomach pressure, which causes early satiety; increased gastric emptying for faster small-bowel transit time; and neurohormonal changes, including the reduction of both fasting and meal-stimulated ghrelin production and increased glucagonlike peptide-1 and peptide-YY, an intestinal hormone that increases satiety.

Whereas normal stomach anatomy can hold approximately 1,500 mL, VSG reduces this volume to 90 to 220 mL.14 Yehoshua and colleagues assessed the stomach volumes and pressures of 20 patients who had undergone VSG and found that sleeve volumes held anywhere from 90 to 220 mL.15 When the sleeve was filled with a volume of saline, the pressure inside the sleeve rose to 43 mm Hg compared with 34 mm Hg when the stomach was intact. VSG reduces the stomach’s ability to distend, thereby increasing the amount of pressure within the intraluminal space. This increase in pressure leads to feeling of fullness and may lead to weight loss by reducing caloric intake.

One interesting feature of VSG is most patients’ temporary absence of hunger following the procedure.16 The hypothalamus and gut hormones control hunger and satiety neurohormonally. While most gut hormones are considered anorectic because they suppress the appetite, ghrelin is known as the only orexigenic (appetite-stimulating) gut hormone.16 Ghrelin is produced primarily in the stomach but also in the duodenum, jejunum, and lung.

In an intact anatomy, ghrelin is an endogenous hormone that stimulates the release of growth hormone and the appetite. It plays a role in body weight regulation independent of growth hormones by initiating food intake. With VSG, loss of appetite, despite a patient’s restricted hypocaloric intake, is explained by the elimination of the majority of ghrelin-producing cells by resecting and removing most of the stomach.17

In a prospective study comparing ghrelin levels between 10 VSG and 10 adjustable gastric band patients, Langer and colleagues showed significant ghrelin reduction in VSG patients beginning the first day after surgery, and it remained low through six months after the operation.18

Other studies have shown that ghrelin levels remain low even longer than six months postoperatively, aiding in the weight-loss process.18,19 Karamanakos and colleagues demonstrated that ghrelin reduction also concomitantly increased levels of peptide-YY.20 The interplay among the sleeve, ghrelin, and other hormones is complicated and not fully understood but is believed to play a major role in the weight-loss mechanism. 

Weight-Loss Efficacy and Comorbidity Remission
Weight-loss success after bariatric surgery is expressed in terms of either percent of excess weight loss (% EWL) or percent of excess BMI loss (% EBMIL). Table 1 shows the formulas to calculate these two percentages.21

Table 1: Formulas to Calculate Weight-Loss Success in Bariatrics21


% EWL

% EBMIL

(pre-op weight – post-op weight)/(pre-op weight – ideal body weight) × 100

(initial BMI – final BMI)/(initial BMI – 25) x 100

 

According to the Third International Summit on the Current Status of the Sleeve Gastrectomy, VSG shows durable weight-loss outcomes. At one year, % EWL is reported as 62.7% and sustained at approximately 60% at five years.22

In terms of weight loss and the resolution of comorbidities, including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), VSG’s effectiveness is considered to be positioned between two other bariatric procedures: gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding. According to a report by the American College of Surgeons, remission or improvement of type 2 diabetes within the first year after VSG is 55%, whereas the efficacy of diabetes resolution with gastric bypass and the adjustable gastric band is 83% and 44%, respectively.23

The percentage of remission of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea within one year after VSG surgery is 68%, 35%, and 62%, respectively, compared with 79%, 66%, and 66%, respectively, with gastric bypass. However, GERD shows less remission at one year following VSG compared with gastric bypass and the adjustable gastric band.23

Eligibility: Indications and Contraindications
The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel established general guidelines and indications for bariatric surgery in 1991.24 General indication criteria for bariatric surgery includes patients who have a BMI higher than 40 or higher than 35 with high-risk comorbid conditions such as cardiopulmonary disease or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, or physical problems that interfere with patients’ ability to participate in a healthful lifestyle, such as joint disease. Bariatric candidates also should have a documented history of unsuccessful weight loss through conventional means of diet therapy and exercise programs.

While currently there’s no consensus on the contraindications, bariatric surgeons agree that bariatric surgery may not be advisable for patients who present with extremely high operative risks, actively engage in substance abuse, or present with major psychopathological conditions that would inhibit their understanding or comprehension of the nature of the surgery and need for life-long lifestyle changes.

Indications and contraindications pertaining more specifically to VSG were suggested in the International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement.13 Based on this statement, VSG is valid in the following cases: as a stand-alone or two-step procedure and option for high-risk patients, for liver and transplant candidates, for patients who are morbidly obese and have the metabolic syndrome or who have a BMI of 30 to 35 and comorbid conditions, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, for elderly patients, and as a one-step revisional procedure from adjustable gastric band to VSG. The statement also notes that VSG is an absolute contraindication for patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

While some of the literature indicates that severe GERD is a contraindication for VSG, a consensus hasn’t been reached because other literature shows that a properly fashioned sleeve doesn’t automatically exacerbate or induce GERD.25 In fact, data have shown that GERD symptoms immediately may increase for up to six months postoperatively and may be related more to patient intolerance or poor compliance to their changed diet. GERD symptoms then decreased up to three years postoperatively.26

Pre- and Postoperative Nutrition Considerations
RDs play an essential role in bariatric patients’ nutritional welfare by performing comprehensive nutrition assessments to identify, prevent, or correct deficiencies. Ideally, nutrition assessments should occur both pre- and postoperatively. Dietitians also continually educate their patients on appropriate foods and bariatric products, and they offer support and strategies to overcome dietary challenges.

To help VSG patients, RDs should understand these patients’ specific nutrition concerns, as discussed below.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Since obesity is a risk factor for developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), patients often are required to follow a “liver-shrinking diet” typically comprised of a high-protein, low-carbohydrate liquid diet with very few calories to reduce fatty liver and intra-abdominal fat before surgery.

Research estimates that 30% to 100% of patients with obesity have NAFLD characterized by an enlarged liver (hepatomegaly), insulin resistance, and elevated liver enzymes.27 Shrinking the liver helps improve the surgical view in laparoscopic surgery, and surgeons recommend following the liver-shrinking diet for a minimum of two weeks before surgery. For patients following this diet for longer than two weeks, surgeons may allow patients to include up to 2 cups of nonstarchy vegetables daily.28

However, the liver-shrinking diet is difficult to follow because patients often feel hungry, may be nervous about the surgery, and experience emotional disconnect and grieving with the food restriction. An RD can offer support by suggesting strategies and appropriate beverages to get patients through this time period. One strategy, for example, is to change the textures of high-protein shakes and make them into high-protein ice cream or pudding. Merely changing the liquid to a soft texture makes the diet more palatable.

Preoperative Nutritional Deficiencies
Nutritional deficiencies can occur with VSG even though patients have intact intestinal systems. Obesity itself is considered a form of malnutrition because deficiencies in both water- and fat-soluble vitamins are seen in the obese population. Kaider-Person and colleagues demonstrated that deficiencies in folate and vitamins A, B1, B12, D, and E commonly are seen in patients with obesity.29 Research also has shown that up to 51% of patients undergoing VSG had below-normal levels of at least one micronutrient, such as iron, potassium, folate, or vitamins B6, B12, and D.30

The goal is to correct these deficiencies before surgery because they may be exacerbated after surgery as a result of poor oral intake and tolerance, noncompliance to a bariatric nutrition protocol, rigor of the protocol, absence of dietary guidance, inadequacy of food variety, and adherence to proton-pump inhibitors often prescribed for some time after surgery to reduce stomach acid, which can lead to malabsorption of B12 and iron.

Postoperative Nutritional Deficiencies
While research still is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of VSG on micronutrient status, vitamin and mineral deficiencies after the procedure are reported up to five years post-op.

Research has shown that patients who undergo VSG are at risk of microcytic and pernicious anemia as well as metabolic bone disease because of micronutrient deficiencies in iron, folate, and vitamins B12 and D.31-34 VSG decreases hydrochloric acid production and creates a significantly reduced intrinsic factor, directly affecting iron and B12 absorption. Thiamin (vitamin B1) deficiency leading to Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome also has been reported in several cases after VSG.35-37

Moizé and colleagues reported that, after five years, vitamin and mineral deficiencies with VSG corresponded with those seen five years after gastric bypass. VSG patients who take metformin also are at risk of vitamin B12 malabsorption.38

Despite universal supplementation, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was the most commonly observed deficiency five years postoperatively in VSG patients. Research also has shown that while most bariatric programs and hospital protocols agree that vitamins and minerals are important, there’s variability in the prescribed vitamin/mineral protocol, and a single multivitamin containing more than 100% of the Recommended Dietary Intake may be insufficient to provide some of the necessary micronutrients while concomitantly providing excess in others.32-34

Dumping Syndrome
Dumping syndrome is more commonly seen with gastric bypass and caused by rapid emptying of simple carbohydrates into the jejunum-ileum, which leads patients to experience watery diarrhea, diaphoresis (extreme sweating), episodic hypoglycemia, abdominal pain, bloating, stomach rumbling, tachycardia, flushing, and nausea.

The syndrome is categorized into early or late, depending on when symptoms begin and their severity. Typically, signs of early dumping syndrome include gastrointestinal upset, diarrhea, bloating, sweating, palpitations, and dizziness. Late dumping syndrome generally includes hypoglycemia, fainting, confusion, and excessive hunger.

At one time, dumping syndrome wasn’t believed to occur with VSG because the duodenum remained intact. However, Tzovaras and colleagues demonstrated that VSG patients, when given an oral glucose challenge, can experience clinical symptoms of early or late dumping syndrome characterized by hypoglycemia, nausea, diaphoresis, and fainting.39 Therefore, patients should be educated about avoiding an excessive intake of simple sugars after surgery.

Postoperative Nutritional Side Effects
Interestingly, while VSG is dramatically different than gastric bypass and adjustable band surgery in terms of the procedure itself, patients who undergo VSG experience similar postoperative symptoms of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, gas, lactose intolerance, electrolyte imbalance, food aversions, and sensory enhancement.

Potential VSG side effects that have nutritional consequences best addressed by a bariatric dietitian include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, vitamin and mineral deficiencies, protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia (iron deficient and pernicious), telogen effluvium (hair loss), adverse sensory stimulations, food aversion/intolerance, hypoglycemia/early dumping syndrome, and metabolic bone disease.40

Because VSG is considered a restrictive and food-limiting surgery, occasional nausea and vomiting can be experienced up to six months postoperatively or longer. Melissas and colleagues reported that nearly 36% of VSG patients experienced vomiting after consuming inappropriately sized meals.40

The dietitian plays an integral role in identifying symptoms that may be related more to the surgical risks than to dietary consequences. For example, gastric leak, gastric ulcer, and gastric stricture are serious sleeve-associated risks that initially may present as dehydration, abdominal and back pain, fever, nausea, vomiting, and anemia. The dietitian may be the first health care professional who recognizes these symptoms, which reinforces the importance of having an interdisciplinary health care team for the bariatric surgery patient.

Current Nutrition Guidelines
To date, there’s no single, standardized bariatric diet. However, there are several published bariatric nutrition practice guidelines available for RDs who counsel patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. The ASMBS has published the ASMBS Allied Health Nutritional Guidelines for the Surgical Weight Loss Patient.41 Unfortunately, the guidelines don’t provide specific recommendations for VSG per se, and these guidelines currently are under review for revision. Programs that use the ASMBS guidelines consider VSG to be a restrictive procedure and may follow the recommendations listed for them.

In 2010, Snyder-Marlowe and colleagues published micronutrient guidelines specific for VSG, and Table 2 summarizes these recommendations.42

Table 2: Micronutrient Recommendations for VSG42

Micronutrient

Recommendation

Chewable bariatric multivitamin that contains iron, copper, and zinc

200% Daily Value of at least two-thirds of nutrients

 

Chewable or liquid calcium citrate with vitamin D

1,000 to 1,500 mg of calcium citrate and 400 to 800 mg of vitamin D3 daily

Sublingual vitamin B12

500 mcg/day

Chewable elemental iron

325 mg elemental iron, including the amount taken in the multivitamin

 

The most recent evidence-based recommendations for VSG come from a collaboration of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and the ASMBS. In their 2013 update of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutritional, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of the Bariatric Surgery Patient, recommendations are made for some macro- and micronutrients appropriate for VSG patients.43 The suggested nutrition recommendations are minimal, though, and each patient should be assessed individually for more specific needs. The recommendations, which provide general information about early postoperative nutrition and micronutrients specifically for VSG, are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: 2013 Current Nutrition Guidelines for VSG43

Macro-/Micronutrient

Recommendation

Protein

Minimum of 60 g/day and up to 1.5 g/kg of ideal body weight; higher amounts up to 2.1 g/kg of ideal body weight assessed on an individual basis

Fluids

More than 1.5 L/day, low sugar

Fruits and vegetables

Five daily servings

Concentrated sweets

Eliminate

Multivitamin/multimineral containing iron, folic acid, and thiamine

Two tablets (Daily Value not indicated)

Calcium citrate

1,200 to 1,500 mg/day

Vitamin D

3,000 or more units to titrate lab result to more than 30 ng/mL

Vitamin B12

Sublingual, subcutaneous, intramuscular, or orally as needed to maintain normal levels

Iron

45 to 60 mg via multivitamins and additional supplements

 

The guidelines also recommend that a dietitian who’s knowledgeable about bariatric nutrition guide patients in diet initiation and meal progression postsurgery and that a low-sugar, clear-liquid diet be initiated within 24 hours postsurgery and advanced as a staged meal progression. The International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement recommends patients wait to begin eating solid food until at least two weeks after surgery.13 Patients also should be advised to eat three meals per day and thoroughly chew small bites of food. Patients should consume fluid 30 minutes after food consumption. General nutrition guidance and a proposed staged diet progression are outlined in Table 4.41-43

Table 4: Recommended Diet Progression41-43

Stage

Foods

Duration

1

Clear liquids, sugar and caffeine free

24 to 48 hours

2

Full liquid diet, lactose free

10 to 14 days

3

Puréed protein foods, incorporate puréed fruit, vegetables, and starch as recommended by dietitian

10 to 14 days

4

Mechanically altered soft foods

Variable

5

Regular diet that incorporates a variety of nutrient-dense foods; focus on protein intake first to meet daily needs

Lifelong

Patients who have undergone VSG should be encouraged to participate in regular follow-up visits with their interdisciplinary bariatric team. For each patient, an RD should perform a comprehensive nutrition assessment to identify, prevent, or correct deficiencies.

Dietitians should be aware that patient compliance with a postoperative daily vitamin and mineral regimen is a challenge seen across all bariatric procedures. According to a study by Wardé-Kamar and colleagues, only 77% of patients reported complying with their daily multivitamin intake; 66% complied with calcium intake; 27.4% complied with vitamin D intake; and 27.8% complied with folate intake.44

Preoperative education as well as postoperative reinforcement of bariatric protocol is paramount for VSG patients’ long-term success. Education and counseling should focus on supporting and teaching patients about meaningful lifestyle changes and correcting the misperception that bariatric surgery is a quick fix or magic bullet.

Future Implications and Opportunities
VSG is the fastest-growing bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. The procedure’s durability is contingent on positive patient outcomes. The RD, as an integral member of an interdisciplinary bariatric health team, plays an important role in identifying, preventing, and correcting nutritional challenges before and after VSG.

While long-term research is needed to elucidate the evidence-based practice most appropriate for dietary counseling with VSG patients, dietitians should consider participating in research that reports findings and validates nutrition recommendations.

VSG is a unique procedure set apart from other bariatric procedures, such as gastric bypass, the adjustable band, and BPD-DS. RDs should encourage patients who have undergone any type of bariatric surgery to obtain postoperative follow-up care with their interdisciplinary bariatric teams. RDs educated in bariatric nutrition should continue to be at the forefront of care for these patients and perform comprehensive nutrition assessments to provide medical nutrition therapy based on patients’ specific individual micro- and macronutrient needs.

As the number of VSG surgeries increases each year, and coupled with the lack of long-term evidence on the efficacy of the procedure, providing proper nutrition advice to patients becomes even more critical. With a lack of consensus or standardization of bariatric nutrition guidelines for VSG, a patient-centered approach to care using all available guidelines combined with a dietitian’s expertise can prove most advantageous for successfully helping patients through their bariatric journeys. 

— Lillian Craggs-Dino, DHA, RDN, LDN, is a practicing bariatric dietitian, support group coordinator for a renowned bariatric program in south Florida, national and international speaker, and freelance food and nutrition writer.

 

Learning Objectives
After completing this continuing education course, nutrition professionals should be better able to:

1. Describe the history of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) as a stand-alone bariatric procedure and distinguish its mechanism of action and efficacy.

2. Identify potential nutritional deficiencies that result from undergoing the procedure.

3. Apply current practice nutrition guidelines to direct dietary counseling.

4. Demonstrate the importance and role of the dietitian in VSG’s durability and success.

 

CPE Monthly Examination

1. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) as a stand-alone bariatric procedure first began as which of the following?
a. It was the second step in a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for patients who were super morbidly obese.
b. VSG always was considered a stand-alone bariatric procedure.
c. It was the first step in a two-step bariatric procedure called biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.
d. It was the first step in a two-step bariatric procedure called vertical banded gastroplasty.

2. Which appetite-stimulating hormone decreases following VSG?
a. Peptide-YY
b. Growth hormone
c. Cholecystokinin
d. Ghrelin

3. Which of the following is the key aspect of the mechanism of action by which VSG induces weight loss?
a. It is a restrictive procedure that reduces stomach capacity to approximately 90 to 220 mL and decreases the amount of food intake.
b. It causes calorie and vitamin malabsorption by disrupting how food flows from the stomach to the intestines.
c. It reduces gastric emptying.
d. It causes an increase in hunger by increasing ghrelin production.

4. Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome has been reported in VSG patients. This syndrome is caused by a deficiency of which vitamin?
a. Folate
b. B12
c. B2
d. B1

5. Which of the following groups of patients aren’t eligible for VSG?
a. Those with inflammatory bowel disease
b. Those eligible for or awaiting a liver transplant
c. Those with Barrett’s esophagus
d. Those with mild gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

6. When and for what purpose is the liver-shrinking diet recommended?
a. Postoperatively to reduce the incidence of gallstones
b. Preoperatively to reduce the size of the liver to assist with laparoscopic view
c. Postoperatively to enhance weight-loss success
d. Preoperatively to begin teaching patients about portion control

7. VSG significantly reduces intrinsic factor and therefore would directly affect the absorption of which of the following?
a. Folate
b. Vitamin B1
c. Vitamin B2
d. Vitamin B12

8. Weight-loss success after VSG is calculated based on which of the following?
a. Achievement of the patient’s ideal body weight
b. The patient’s percentage of excess weight loss
c. The patient’s attainment of a normal BMI
d. The patient’s lowest adult weight

9. Which form of calcium is recommended after VSG?
a. Carbonate
b. Gluconate
c. Combination carbonate/citrate
d. Citrate

10. According to the most recently proposed dietary guidelines, how many meals per day are recommended for VSG patients?
a. Two
b. Three
c. Four
d. Five

 

References
1. Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html. Updated March 2013. Accessed May 15, 2013.

2. Adult obesity facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html. Last updated August 16, 2013. Accessed May 15, 2013.

3. ASMBS position statement: bariatric surgery in class 1 obesity (BMI 30-35kg/m2). American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery website. http://asmbs.org/2012/09/bariatric-surgery-in-class-1-obesity-bmi-30-35-kgm2/. Updated September 7, 2012.

4. Batsis JA, Sarr MG, Collazo-Clavell ML, et al. Cardiovascular risk after bariatric surgery for obesity. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(7):930-937.

5. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, McLeod MK. Bariatric surgery: the past, present, and future. Obes Surg. 2008;18(1):121-128.

6. Trelles N, Gagner M. Sleeve gastrectomy. Op Tech Gen Sur. 2007;123-131.

7. Abu-Jaish W, Rosenthal RJ. Sleeve gastrectomy: a new surgical approach for morbid obesity. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4(1):101-119. 

8. ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(3):e21-e26.

9. Decision memo for bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity (CAG-00250R2). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website. http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=258&NcaName=Bariatric+Surgery+for+the+Treatment+of+Morbid+
Obesity&CoverageSelection=National&KeyWord=obesity&KeyWordLookUp=Title&KeyWord
SearchType=And&where=index&nca_id=2
. June 27, 2012. Accessed May 20, 2013.

10. Johnston D, Dachtler J, Sue-Ling HM, King RF, Martin IG. The Magenstrasse and Mill operation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):10-16.

11. Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17(10):1297-1305.

12. Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L, Strain G, Dakin G, Pomp A. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):528-533.

13. Rosenthal R; International Sleeve Gastronomy Expert Panel. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8-19.

14. Melissas J, Koukouraki S, Askoxylakis J, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg. 2007;17(1):57-62.

15. Yehoshua RT, Eidelman LA, Stein M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—volume and pressure assessment. Obes Surg. 2008;18(9):1083-1088.

16. Chaudhri OB, Wynne K, Bloom SR. Can gut hormones control appetite and prevent obesity? Diabetes Care. 2008;31 Suppl 2:S284-S289.

17. Papailiou J, Albanopoulos K, Toutouzas KG, Tsigris C, Nikiteas N, Zografos G. Morbid obesity and the sleeve gastrectomy: how does it work? Obes Surg. 2010;20(10):1448-1455.

18. Langer FB, Reza Hoda MS, Bohdjalian A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1024-1029.

19. Wang Y, Liu J. Plasma ghrelin modulation in gastric band operation and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2009;19(3):357-362.

20. Karamanakos SN, Jagenas K, Kalfarentzos F, Alexandrides TK. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-yy levels after roux-en-y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):401-407.

21. Keren D, Matter I, Rainis T, Lavy A. Getting the most from the sleeve: the importance of post-operative follow-up. Obes Surg. 2011;21(12):1887-1893.

22. Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL, Crosby RD. Third international summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(6):749-759.

23. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons-Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410-422.

24. Buchwald H; Consensus Conference Panel. Consensus conference statement bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: health implications for patients, health professionals, and third-party payers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(3):371-381.

25. Kakoulidis TP, Karringer A, Gloaguen T, Arvidsson D. Initial results with sleeve gastrectomy for patients with class I obesity (BMI 30-35 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):425-428.

26. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319-324.

27. Lewis MC, Phillips ML, Slavotinek JP, Kow L, Thompson CH, Toouli J. Change in liver size and fat content after treatment with Optifast very low calorie diet. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):697-701.

28. Colles SL, Dixon JB, Marks P, Strauss BJ, O’Brien PE. Preoperative weight loss with a very-low-energy diet: quantitation of changes in liver and abdominal fat by serial imaging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):304-311.

29. Kaider-Person O, Person B, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Nutritional deficiencies in morbidly obese patients: a new form of malnutrition. Part B: minerals. Obes Surg. 2008;18(8):1028-1034.

30. Damms-Machado A, Friedrich A, Kramer KM, et al. Pre- and postoperative nutritional deficiencies in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22(6):881-889.

31. Hakeam HA, O’Regan PJ, Salem AM, Bamehriz FY, Eldali AM. Impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on iron indices: 1 year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2009;19(11):1491-1496.

32. Gehrer S, Kern B, Peters T, Christoffel-Courtin C, Peterli R. Fewer nutrient deficiencies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) than after laparoscopic roux-y-gastric bypass (LRYGB): a prospective study. Obes Surg. 2010;20(4):447-453.

33. Capoccia D, Coccia F, Paradiso F, et al. Laparoscopic gastric sleeve and micronutrients supplementation: our experience. J Obes. 2012;2012:672162.

34. Aarts EO, Janssen IM, Berends FJ. The gastric sleeve: losing weight as fast as micronutrients? Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):207-211.

35. Makarewicz W, Kaska L, Kobiela J, et al. Wenicke’s syndrome after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2007;17(5):704-706.

36. Scarano V, Milone M, Di Minno MN, et al. Late micronutrient deficiency and neurological dysfunction after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case report. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(5):645-647.

37. Jeong HJ, Park JW, Kim YJ, Lee YG, Jang YW, Seo JW. Wernicke’s encephalopathy after sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a case report. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(4):583-586.

38. Moizé V, Andreu A, Flores L, et al. Long-term dietary intake and nutritional deficiencies following sleeve gastrectomy or roux-en-y gastric bypass in a Mediterranean population. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(3):400-410.

39. Tzovaras G, Papamargaritis D, Sioka E, et al. Symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome alter provocation in patients alter laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):23-28.

40. Melissas J, Daskalakis M, Koukouraki S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: a “food limiting” operation. Obes Surg. 2008;18(10):1251-1256.

41. Allied Health Sciences Section Ad Hoc Nutrition Committee, Aills L, Blankenship J, Buffington C, Furtado M, Parrott J. ASMBS allied health nutritional guidelines for the surgical weight loss patient. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(5 Suppl):S73-S108.

42. Snyder-Marlowe G, Taylor D, Lenhard MJ. Nutrition care for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for weight loss. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(4):600-607.

43. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21 Suppl 1:S1-S27.

44. Wardé-Kamar J, Rogers M, Flancbaum L, Laferrere B. Calorie intake and meal patterns up to 4 years after roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(8):1070-1079.