Food Choices Can Help Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Changes in diet have been proposed as a way to reduce carbon emissions from the food system. But there has been little research on the affordability and feasibility of low-carbon food choices in the United States and how these choices could affect diet and climate change.
A new study that provides the latest, most comprehensive estimate of greenhouse gas emissions generated by US consumer food purchases suggests that, if Americans directed their food purchases away from meats and other animal proteins, they could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
"We found that households that spend more of their weekly food budget on beef, chicken, pork, and other meats are generating more greenhouse gas emissions. Our study shows that encouraging consumers to make food choices that are lower in greenhouse gas emissions can make a real difference addressing climate change," says Rebecca Boehm, PhD, the study's lead author and a University of Connecticut Postdoctoral Fellow with the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity and the Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
Altering food consumption could be a key area for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, as food purchases accounted for 16% of US greenhouse gas emissions in 2013, according to the study. By comparison, commercial/residential activity accounted for 12% and industrial activity accounted for 21% of the nation's greenhouse gas emissions.
The study was recently published in the journal Food Policy.
The researchers used nationally representative data on food purchases, linking detailed household purchase data to a US Environmental Protection Agency tool that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions from every stage of the food supply chain, including production, manufacturing, distribution, transportation, and retail and restaurants.
"This study is a major advancement in our understanding the contribution of US food choices to climate change," according to Boehm. Previous studies conducted in the United States did not always capture greenhouse gas emissions from all parts of the food system.
Key findings of the study include the following:
• Industries that produce beef, pork, and other red meat generated the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions from household purchases, approximately 21%, followed by fresh vegetables and melons (11%), cheese industries (10%), and milk products and butter (7%).
• Greenhouse gas emissions generated by household food spending varied by race and educational attainment. More than 80% of households generating very high greenhouse gas emissions from their food spending (top fifth of households) were white. Twenty-six percent of households in the highest (top fifth) tier of greenhouse gas emissions had a survey respondent with a college degree, compared with approximately 12% in the bottom fifth for greenhouse gas emissions.
• Participation in the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was associated with less greenhouse gas emissions from food spending (when not accounting for other household characteristics). Approximately 24% of households in the bottom fifth for greenhouse gas emissions participated in SNAP; only 9% of households in the top fifth for greenhouse gas emissions participated in SNAP.
"It's striking that many of the opportunities for environmentally friendly dietary changes are with the households that have the most resources," says Sean B. Cash, PhD, senior author of the study, and the Bergstrom Foundation Professor in Global Nutrition at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University in Massachusetts. "Changes in food consumption in these households could reduce greenhouse gases by a disproportionate amount."
"For the first time, our study shows the association between the greenhouse gas emissions generated by the food system, household food spending patterns, and sociodemographic characteristics," Boehm says. "These findings can inform the debate on which diets and food spending patterns can best mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from the food system, while informing educational efforts to encourage low-carbon diets among the US population."— Source: Tufts University