Cutting Food Waste Alone Likely Won’t Solve Nutrition Needs
Reducing food waste is crucial to our ability to feed the growing human population but it won't solve the problem alone, according to a new study based on a computational model.
Researchers calculated that the world already produces enough protein and energy to feed 9.7 billion people—the projected population as of 2050—if food waste were cut in half. However, projections indicate global food production will still fall short in terms of micronutrients needed for good health, including calcium, iron, vitamin E, and others.
“Reducing food waste would give us enough protein and food energy to feed the 2050 population today—but not enough of the essential vitamins and minerals we need,” says Nick Smith, PhD, a research officer at the Riddet Institute and the study’s lead author. “This suggests that food waste is an important issue to tackle but won’t necessarily resolve all the world’s nutritional needs.”
Smith presented the research at NUTRITION 2021 LIVE ONLINE.
The study is based on the DELTA Model, a computational model that calculates the amount of food nutrients available to the global population under different assumptions about population size, agricultural productivity, and food waste. Designed for use by researchers and the lay public alike, the model calculates the nutrients available under different scenarios after considering waste, animal feed uses, and other nonfood uses of agricultural productivity. One unique attribute of the DELTA Model is that it not only accounts for foods’ nutritional content but also the body’s ability to utilize those nutrients.
“When thinking about food system sustainability, it’s important to consider all aspects of sustainability: environmental, economic, social, health, and nutritional,” Smith says. “And nutrition doesn’t just mean enough energy—it has to be the right foods, the right balance of nutrition.”
One reason why cutting waste will only get us so far is that we tend to waste more of certain types of foods than others, researchers say. For example, we waste around 25% of vegetable mass after it leaves the farm gate, whereas for milk this number is around 7%. In terms of nutrients, this example contributes to a higher amount of fiber wasted compared with calcium and shows how cutting waste won’t have the same impact across all nutrients.
Approximately 30% of food produced in the United States is wasted each year, according to a recent report. Food waste occurs at each point in the pipeline from farm to table, with consumer behaviors accounting for a sizeable portion. Models such as DELTA can help inform decision making to optimize global food systems for the coming decades.
“The DELTA Model wasn’t designed to find the ‘right answer’ for what the food system should look like,” Smith notes. “Rather, it is a tool for understanding the food system, testing ideas and hypotheses, and informing debate. Its results are important for the global conversation of what food the world needs to produce.”— Source: American Society for Nutrition