Nov. 20 - Doubled Calorie Intake from Beverages Likely Contributes
to Adult Obesity
It’s not just sugary sodas that are adding
to the obesity crisis – it’s fruit drinks, alcohol
and a combination of other high-calorie beverages, say University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health researchers.
And during the holidays, when eggnog, cocktails and spiced cider
are abundant, the problem can be even more apparent.
Over the past 37 years, the number of calories
adults get through beverages has nearly doubled, according to
a UNC study published in the November issue of Obesity
Research by Kiyah J. Duffey, a doctoral candidate
in the department of nutrition, and Barry M. Popkin, PhD, professor
of nutrition and a fellow at the Carolina Population Center.
The study used nationally representative data
to quantify both trends and patterns in beverage consumption
among 46,576 American adults aged 19 and older. Patterns and
trends of all beverages adults consumed were examined between
1965 and 2002. Researchers found that, over these 37 years,
total daily intake of calories from beverages increased by 94%, providing an average 21% of daily energy intake
among U.S. adults. That amounts to an additional 222 calories
from all beverages daily.
Water intake was measured from 1989 to 2002,
and during that time, the amount of water consumed stayed roughly
the same, but the average adult consumed an additional 21 ounces
per day of other beverages, Popkin said.
“This has considerable implications for
numerous health outcomes, including obesity and diabetes as
this is just adding several hundred calories daily to our overall
caloric intake,” Popkin said.
Most researchers agree that beverages do not
fill you up, Popkin said. “Regardless of beverage type
– water, sodas, milk, orange juice or beer – those
extra calories are not compensated for by a reduction in food
intake.”
Data analyzed for this study came from the federally
funded Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys of 1965 and 1977-1978
and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys of
1989-1994 and 1999-2002.
“For each exam year, we calculated total
energy intake, percent consuming and calories per consumer for
16 different beverages, and determined total beverage intake
(fluid ounces) for each beverage,” Duffey said. “Then,
using a method that finds patterns within data, we generated
5 different groups of individuals who had similar patterns of
beverage consumption and compared the beverages that comprised
these groups in 1977 and 2002 to determine if the combinations
of beverages were different.”
As it turns out, they were different.
“The biggest difference we observed was
that the 2002 beverage patterns were more complex than they
were in 1977,” she said. “For example, just five
beverages dominated the patterns in 1977, but in 2002 there
were eight beverages consumed in significant quantities –
and new beverages appeared in these 2002 patterns. Fruit and
vegetable juices and diet beverages were not important in 1977
patterns, but were in 2002.”
Equally important, Popkin noted, are the overall
trends in total calories from beverages. In 1965, beverages
accounted for just 12% of daily energy intake. That number
jumped to 21% by 2002.
As noted in previous studies, 23% more
adults reported drinking soda between 1965 and 2002 (accounting
for an additional 108 calories per day) while calories from
whole-fat milk declined nearly 45% (from 119 calories
per day in 1965 to 69 calories per day in 2002). Alcohol (up
73 calories per day) and fruit juice (up 20 calories per day)
had considerable increases in their contribution to daily energy
intake as well.
“One of the strengths of this study,”
Popkin said, “is that we examined the full range of beverages
consumed, providing a broad understanding of the role of beverages,
and patterns of beverages, to overall dietary intake.”
Because data are not collected on the same individuals
over time, conclusions cannot be made about the influence of
the observed trends or patterns on changes in individual health
outcomes over time, but they can provide a starting point for
future analyses to examine this issue.
Source: University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill
(View Daily
news Archive)
|