Home

Cover Story

Table of Contents

E-Newsletter

Article Archive

Editorial Calendar

Datebook

Writers' Guidelines

Orgs/Links

Reprints


June 2005

Putting a Price Tag on Food Poisoning Fallout
By Sharon Palmer, RD
Today’s Dietitian

Vol. 7 No. 6 P. 30

A food poisoning incident can be a mighty expensive problem. Don’t think it can’t happen to you.

Today foodborne illness has gone beyond impersonal statistics—now it has a name and a face. Like that of Brianne Kiner, a 9-year-old girl from Washington State, who spent 40 days in a coma, 188 days on dialysis, and received 80 units of blood in 1993, just because she ate tainted hamburgers from Jack in the Box. Brianne earned the title of being the sickest child in the United States to survive E. coli 0157:H7. Over a three-month period in 1993, more than 700 children and adults in four states in the Northwest became ill after eating at various Jack in the Box restaurants. Fifty-five cases progressed into hemolytic uremic syndrome and four children died. The price tag for Brianne’s case of foodborne illness? A mere $15.6 million, with Foodmaker, Inc., the parent company of Jack in the Box, setting aside a $100 million pool to cover all lawsuits related to the outbreak.1

Plenty of other high-profile food poisoning outbreaks have made the evening news, newspapers, and court dockets in the last decade. In May 1998, Odwalla Juice settled E. coli litigation for a reported $12 million for the families of children who were severely injured after consuming Odwalla apple juice. In 2001, the jury returned a verdict of $4.75 million for an E. coli case involving a school lunch program in Washington State. In 2003, 650 confirmed cases were linked to a hepatitis A outbreak from a Chi-Chi’s restaurant in Pennsylvania, resulting in three deaths, a liver transplant for one man, and a class action law suit filed against Chi-Chi’s. The 2004 Las Vegas Flamingo Hotel norovirus outbreak resulted in more than 1,000 sick patrons and employees, prompting a class action case to be filed against the hotel owners. Tomatoes produced by Coronet foods and purchased at the Pennsylvania Sheetz convenience stores caused a Salmonella outbreak in 485 people in 2004, with the legal fallout spurring the closure and bankruptcy of the Coronet plant.1

Very Expensive Bugs
Foodborne illness has become a tangible threat attached with very real costs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 76 million cases of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year, with 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths.2 The estimated costs of medical expenses and lost wages and productivity due to foodborne illness is between $6.5 and $34 billion.3 In 2000, the Economic Research Service of the USDA estimated the cost from five bacterial foodborne pathogens (Campylobacter, Salmonella, E.coli O157, E. coli non-O157 STEC, and Listeria monocytogenes) at $6.9 billion per year.4 A single outbreak of foodborne illness can cost a foodservice operation as much as $75,000 in legal fees, medical claims, lost employee wages, cleaning, sanitizing, discarded food supplies, and lost revenue. This figure rises dramatically if the incident involves death or serious injury.5

Food Poisoning as Personal Injury
William D. Marler, managing partner in the Seattle law firm Marler Clark, LLP, PS, represented Brianne Kiner in the Jack in the Box case, creating a Washington State record for an individual personal injury action award. Marler also resolved several other Jack in the Box E. coli cases for more than $2.5 million each. Since those Jack in the Box days, Marler began focusing his practice exclusively on foodborne illness cases, turning his law firm into the only one in the states specializing in foodborne illness litigation. The Marler Clark firm advises potential clients that if they have lost wages and incurred medical bills, then they have a right to be compensated for past and future expenses and pain and suffering.

Marler has taken on foodborne illness with a passion, now dedicating his time to not only punishing the bad offenders that make people sick, but teaching food companies the error of their ways through his nonprofit organization, Outbreak, Inc. Outbreak, Inc. aims to teach directors, managers, and staff the lessons they need to learn before they make the next person sick. Bill Marler is giving back through Outbreak, Inc., providing free education services, only requesting reimbursement for travel expenses and donations to food safety organizations.

“It’s not because of litigation that people should be concerned about food poisoning, they should have a moral reason to not make people sick,” says Marler, who relies on video tapes of horribly injured children during his education and consultation to make an impact on food operations. He often finds food companies consulting Outbreak, Inc. after he successfully sues them for a foodborne illness outbreak.

In this modern age of litigation, it’s easy to wonder whether foodborne illness litigation is treading into the frivolous lawsuit territory. But Marler says it isn’t so. “We turn away about 90% of people who call about litigation for foodborne illness. The reality is, if you poison someone, the chances are you are not going to get caught. The CDC reports 76 million people with foodborne illness per year, while we only have 10,000 to 15,000 active files in our firm at any given time.”

The Good News and the Bad News About Foodborne Illness
Fortunately, it appears that all of our preaching about food safety might finally be paying off. The CDC reported in April that when comparing 1996-1998 with 2004, the incidence of several foodborne infections declined significantly. The estimated incidence of infection with Campylobacter decreased 31%, Cryptosporidium decreased 40%, E. coli O157 decreased 42%, Listeria decreased 40%, Yersinia decreased 45%, and overall Salmonella infections decreased 8%.6

“There is an enormous decrease in E. coli O157 related to hamburger meat cases. I think that the restaurant and beef industry are being more responsible. The meat industry got tired of being sued. On average, I have not seen egregious conduct [recently] that I have seen over the past years,” says Marler, who points out that in the last decade high-profile outbreaks have effected change in the industry, from testing the temperatures of hamburger meat to pasteurizing juice.

Of new concern is the trend toward outbreaks due to fresh produce that require little processing before eating and serving. “With an increase in imports, we bring in products from countries that don’t have HACCP [Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point] and bacteria and viruses are coming in that we don’t have experience with,” says Marler.

Questions are being raised about the impact of recommendations for consuming more fresh fruits and vegetables, even though many may pose greater foodborne illness risks, such as sprouts, lettuce, and cider. And although organic farming is good for the environment, some public health experts are concerned about pathogens from animal manure in foods that are eaten fresh or minimally processed. The CDC reports that new pathogens continue to emerge and that the proportion of outbreaks caused by fruits and vegetables has increased.7

“Sometimes a person’s natural instinct turns to raw meat, poultry, and fish when they think about food safety, hence ignoring safe handling with produce,” says Dana Fillmore, RD, CFSP, corporate dietitian for Gordon Food Service, a broad-line foodservice distributor in Grand Rapids, Mich. “However, produce is certainly not exempt from food safety risk, as evidenced by many foodborne illness outbreaks that have been traced back to produce sources. We must train the foodservice industry to focus food safety policies and procedures on all potentially hazardous foods.”

A Place for Dietitians in Food Safety
And what are we doing about the high cost of foodborne illness? Apparently, not enough. “I start from the premise that food has to be safe in order for it to be nutritious. Food safety is one of the fundamentals that dietitians must integrate into their practice,” says Cathie Woteki, PhD, RD, dean of the College of Agriculture at Iowa State University. Woteki believes dietitians should routinely spend a few moments with their clients to instruct them on food safety basics. Not a bad idea when even the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans include a plug on food safety.

“I have incredible respect for food safety. More nutritionists must be aware of what is going on. The field is enormous, it goes way beyond the one-on-one,” says Arlene Spark, EdD, RD, CSP, FADA, FACN, associate professor and coordinator of nutrition and food science at Hunter College of the City University of New York. Spark has served as a committee member for the New York City Department of Health and developed a 2004 meeting on globalization and food safety.

“The laws that the FDA enforces for food safety place the burden of responsibility of food safety on producers, processors, and preparers. That makes it an issue that dietitians need to know more about,” says Woteki. “I think that particularly for dietitians in foodservice management, these liability issues and public health reasons for food safety should be a major part of their concerns.” Of particular interest are dietitians managing the care of patients or consumers who are at risk due to compromised immune function.

“Dietitians can have input with the board of health,” suggests Spark. Dietitians may also play a role in influencing food policy, not only raising their voices on public nutrition issues, but speaking up on food safety as well. By getting involved with state agricultural and health departments, dietitians can lend their support for food safety efforts.

Stumbling Blocks on the Path to Food Safety
Any dietitian who’s had to pull on a hair net and grab a sanitation checklist is fully aware of the many challenges that exist in developing an effective food safety program. And even if you’ve written the best food safety policies and procedures under the sun, they may not actually happen during the daily grinding, chopping, and dishing in a foodservice operation. “Many foodservice workers are migrants and may be illiterate in both languages, so communication is a challenge,” says Spark, who is working on a point-and-click computer program to teach food safety to individuals who can’t read. Developing a food safety training program that measures the employee’s comprehension, willingness, and ability to perform specific food safety practices is essential to the success of a safe foodservice operation.

“When it comes to the safety of food, I feel that the two most important things for a dietitian to have in place are a comprehensive food safety and sanitation detailed policy and procedures program, including a step-by-step action plan in case of a possible foodborne illness outbreak within their foodservice operation, and a comprehensive employee training program,” says Fillmore, who helps identify HACCP policies and procedures to be followed at Gordon Food Service. “HACCP is a great start to protecting against foodborne illness outbreaks. Used correctly, this approach will hopefully prevent a foodborne illness outbreak. In the case of an outbreak, HACCP programs will provide important documentation that could help identify the cause of the outbreak and hopefully exonerate your staff from blame.”

“Food safety has to be constantly reinforced. The HACCP approach in food preparation has been very beneficial in standardizing approaches and helping to maintain better quality control,” says Woteki, who says new data supports that HACCP in meat and poultry processing has continued to lead to decreases in pathogens in meat and poultry.

Justifying the Price of Food Safety
In a recent survey of dietitians and dietary managers on food safety practices, findings indicated that the greatest barriers to the implementation of HACCP related to insufficient time and the need for written policies for food safety.8 It is difficult to achieve an effective food safety program without the allocated labor resources to set it up.

“You go where the money is,” says Spark, who finds that often management may not support a cause until there is a value associated with it. With today’s high price for foodborne illness litigation, maybe dietitians can finally attach a cost savings for a high-quality food safety program.

And when it comes to the future of foodborne illness in an age of global imports, dietitians should be braced for the unexpected. “We need to be prepared for surprises. When E. coli O157:H7 was first identified, that was a surprise. There could be the emergence of another new food pathogen,” says Woteki. “The margin of error is huge, more now than ever. We can’t be complacent,” comments Spark.

Marler puts it all into perspective. “No one ever thinks it’s going to happen to them.”

— Sharon Palmer, RD, is a freelance food and nutrition journalist in Southern California.

References
1. Marler Clark, LLP, PS Web site. Available at: http://www.marlerclark.com.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Division of Bacterial and Mycotics Diseases, Disease Information. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov

3. Buzby JC, Roberts T. Economic costs and trade impacts of microbial food borne illness. World Health Stat Q. 1997;50(1-2):57-66.

4. Economic Research Service, USDA Briefing Room. Economics of Foodborne Disease: Overview. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodborneDisease/overview.htm

5. Lynn J. Better safe than sorry: Training food handlers protects everyone. Restaurants USA. 1996:16(8):13-17.

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preliminary FoodNet Data on the Incidence of Infection with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food – 10 Sites. United States. 2004, MMWR. April 15, 2005/54(14);352-356. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5414a2.htm

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Foodborne Infections – Technical Information. December 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov

Resource
Strohbehn CH, Gilmore SA, Sneed J. Food safety practices and HACCP implementation: Perceptions of registered dietitians and dietary managers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(11):1692-1699.


Food Safety Resources at Your Fingertips

FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
www.cfsan.fda.gov/list.html

Food Safety Training and Education Alliance
www.fstea.org

International Food Safety Council
www.foodsafetycouncil.org

National Food Safety Education Month
www.nraef.org/nfsem

Foodborne Illness Educational Information Center
www.nal.usda.gov/foodborne

Integrated Food Safety Information Delivery System
www.profoodsafety.org

Outbreak, Inc.
www.outbreakinc.com

Subscribe to Today's Dietitian Magazine!

tdgiftvert.gif (40687 bytes)


Copyright © 2006 Great Valley Publishing Co., Inc.
3801 Schuylkill Rd • Spring City, PA 19475
Publishers of Today's Dietitian
All rights reserved.